Saturday, April 19, 2014

"You Better Start Swimmin' Or You'll Sink Like a Stone..."

The times they are a’changin.’  -Bob Dylan, 1964



The only constant in life is change.  -Heraclitus of Ephesus circa 500 BCE



The more things change, the more they stay the same.  -French proverb, epigram, “plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose “ credited to Jean-Baptiste Aphonse Karr, 1849

This triptych of aphorisms sprang sequentially to my mind as I began to contemplate leadership implications of technological change, after reviewing the week’s materials (see list below), and each rings true, in its way, when applied to the topic. There is no denying we are in a time of profound societal change. Though the pace has hastened significantly, even exponentially--and though that is significant--a state of change is, and periods of rapid change are, nothing new. And, though technology changes how we do things, and changes some of what we do, our defining traits and basic qualities as humans remain essentially constant.

Among the takes on, speculations about, and views of the future we examined, Shirky's (2009) epilogue stood out for me. It summed up not only Here Comes Everybody, but also many of my personal gleanings from the course. In it, he embraced my recurrent water metaphor (I promise I had not been reading ahead!) as he aptly likened leading amidst our current technology revolution to paddling a kayak, as contrasted with driving a car: no reverse, no brakes, no control of direction, and minimal control of speed, but, if you are adept and alert, the opportunity to make minute course adjustments, avoid obstacles, and, with a little luck avoid capsizing (and risking injury or drowning).

That image describes:
  • Publish then filter replacing filter then publish,
  • Empower and influence replacing command and control,
  • Networked wirearchy replacing rigid hierarchy
  • Increased transparency and customization replacing privacy, anonymity, and genericism, and
  • Fundamental changes to basic societal structures we are only beginning to glimpse.
These inescapable and monumental changes present a mandate to adjust how leaders view, approach, and accomplish their task--and at their very heart, provide impetus towards increased openness, authenticity, humility, cooperation, and collaboration.

The ultimate implications for leading during this change remain formative and largely undefined. However, there is one that resonates with primacy and immediacy. How it is phrased depends on if you align with the 30% of people the Pew Research Internet Project survey found to view anticipated future changes negatively, believing we will be worse off as a result-- in which case it is, "BEWARE," or, if you align with the 59% who anticipate the changes will be positive, leading to improved quality of life on the whole--in which case you can add a letter: BE AWARE! (I suppose the remaining 11% are neutral; to them, we say, "take a stand!")

Personally, I choose optimism, albeit cautious optimism. I have been an early adopter or early majority adopter (Rogers, 2003) of computing and mobile computing innovations.  I had a Palm Pilot in 1998, for example, and today my iPad has completely and effectively replaced a paper notebook/planner in my day-to-day practice.  However,  I am certainly not diving head first into the deep end, without checking for obstacles (see, I can't shake this water thing...); there are still so many legal, ethical, and even simply pragmatic issues and puzzles that need to be worked out. That said, I am making a commitment to make some personal changes: to throw a little bit of my erstwhile caution to the wind, to trust a little more, online, to be come a little more comfortable with less privacy, to embrace social media a little more enthusiastically, and to make more connections. Do I think that is a good idea? Does that make me happy? Here's the thing: I don't believe it even matters, because that is like asking if would I rather drive my car in the river.

6 comments:

  1. Nice post...and I particularly like the differentiation between BEWARE and BE AWARE!

    You started by noting the "profound societal change." Societal...not technological. I think this is key. Mike Wesch, an antropologist at KSU, noted in a keynote:

    "This is a social revolution, not a technological one, and its most revolutionary aspect may be the ways in which it empowers us to rethink education and the teacher-student relationship in an almost limitless variety of ways."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, 'societal revolution.' That just blew my mind!

      Robert

      Delete
  2. Britt, that point, sinking in, is one of my main big takeaways from this course, and this discourse. I know my waxings above tend toward the grandiose and the general, but for me, that is the point, and the big aha.

    I think it is common to feel a sense that one is living in revolutionary times (hence the three quotes). But, where we are today, and what is happening today, well, it's different, isn't it. We are connected, and we are connecting, in an unprecedented way, and our challenge as leaders, and in fact our challenge as individuals, is to make sure that ends up being a good thing--a "greater good" thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Patrick,

    As always, I gain new perspectives from your posts and the comments that follow. I *just* had an 'a-ha' moment of sorts when I read Britt's comment after reading your post concerning this major point: we are talking about societal change. Technology is evolving and changing and will do so on into the future. While the various iterations of technology do affect our lives (betamax or VHS, iPhone or Android, Mac or PC, etc.,); all of it is ultimately about societal change. From writing to phoning to emailing to texting - all of it has affected society and culture and it is the ability of those individuals and leaders to adapt to the societal, cultural - and generational - changes and to embrace them as their own that will ultimately help them in surviving and moving forward.

    Why did the dinosaurs go extinct? Inability to change.

    Why did Kodak go bankrupt? Inability to change.

    Why did Borders (one of my favorite places to hang out) go bankrupt? Inability to change.

    Yes, I know I am disregarding the big huge meteor crashing into the Earth wiping out the dinosaurs theory but it doesn't help to illustrate my point...

    Anyway, the bottom line point is that it isn't about technology and how technology is evolving and developing - it is about how society and culture has been remapped and reshaped by the digital tsunamis of the past decades. It's about societal change and being able to adapt to those changes to keep from drowning and becoming extinct.

    Thank you as always Patrick and Britt for the many 'a-ha' moments that I have had during this course.

    Happy Easter!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you said empower and influence not control and command. There seems to be many leaders out there stuck in this control and command role. They don't want to give their employees the ability to use new technology to improve their work and time. However, those leaders who empower and influence their employees to review, use, and embrace new technology then they won't be successful leaders.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What resonates most with me are 'legal, ethical, and pragmatic issues' of this societal revolution (love it!) we are in the midst of. The constant evolving of technology during this revolution will create new problems. To deal with these problems a whole new field of professionals will be required. Legislators and other professionals will need information for creating and later amending laws to deal with various technological issues. Technological consultants will be in high demand. Our economy will become even more high tech than before. Not only is technology evolving, but we will evolve along with it. Dragging the 30% of people the Pew Research Internet Project survey found that viewed anticipated future changes negatively, kicking and screaming, along with the rest of us.

    Robert

    ReplyDelete